Starting June 1st, the Journal of Philosophy of Disability (JPD) will begin accepting submissions. The JPD is a new peer-reviewed journal dedicated to questions regarding disability, broadly construed, and it is the first of its kind. Edited by Joel Michael Reynolds (Georgetown University) and Teresa Blankmeyer Burke (Gallaudet University), the journal will publish peer-reviewed articles, review essays, critical responses, and commentaries, as well as occasional topical clusters and symposia. The editors welcome scholarship from all philosophical perspectives, including analytic, continental, and pragmatist traditions, the history of philosophy, empirically informed philosophy, non-Western philosophy, and other traditions and fields that substantively engage research in philosophy of disability. The JPD will be published fully open-access by the Philosophy Documentation Center with support from Georgetown University. Please send your submissions to . Inaugural issue authors will include Eva Feder Kittay, Jürgen Habermas, Havi Carel, Leslie Francis, Kim Q. Hall, Adam Cureton, Andrea Pitts, Desiree Valentine, Joe Stramondo, Kevin Timpe, David Wasserman, Melinda Hall, Chris Kaposy, and Licia Carlson.
Like Us on Facebook
Quick Links
Recent Book Reviews
-
Duy Lap Nyugen, Walter Benjamin and the Critique of Political Economy: A New Historical Materialism
-
Talia Welsh, Feminist Existentialism, Biopolitics, and Critical Phenomenology in a Time of Bad Health
-
Fanny Söderbäck, Revolutionary Time: On Time and Difference in Kristeva and Irigaray.
-
Contemporary Italian Women Philosophers: Stretching the Art of Thinking
-
Perry Zurn. Curiosity and Power
Events
Categories
- Book Exchange (1)
- Book Reviews (235)
- Calls for Editors (1)
- Calls for Papers (9)
- Events (9)
- Expired (1)
- News (36)
Quotations
Enough now of absurd theories. No conceivable theory can make us err with respect to the principle of all principles: that every originary presentive intuition is a legitimizing source of cognition, that everything originarily (so to speak in its “personal actuality”) offered to us in “intuition” is to be accepted simply as what it is presented as being, but also only within the limits in which it is presented there.
— Husserl, Ideas I, §24